As we covered in our article āWhat is Debtā, leverage of capital is a key differentiating factor and tool for success for startups, but raising equity capital is a very different activity compared to raising credit capital. Founders who have a deep understanding of how to navigate equity capital raising should be aware of the different ways equity investors and credit investors (aka. āLenderā) think. Being able to understand these differences will help speed up the credit capital raising process and ensure the best outcomes.Ā
All investors - equity or credit or other - all have some common incentives. They are generally all trying to deploy a set amount of capital in a specific amount of time within an investing thesis or mandate. The individual who is making the investment will be incentivized (usually through monetary compensation) to work within these parameters to try to generate the best outcomes possible while avoiding unacceptable risks.
5 key parameters both equity and credit investors think about - but think about differently - are:
ā
Both types of investors can conduct extensive diligence but commonly credit capital investors will conduct more intensive diligence, and at a minimum they will ask different questions. Equity investors are principally interested in determining upside and understanding what factors could kill the company (regulatory, PMF, hiring, competitive environment). Credit investors are more concerned about stability of growth vs. underwriting plans and operational or regulatory issues that could arise. Credit investors will also generally have the ability to structure their documents to box in some of these risks. Equity investors on the other hand usually canāt legally box in a company, they affect change more through providing strategic advice and introductions.Ā
A helpful example we often use when discussing equity and credit is the parallel to purchasing a home - a task many have done themselves or are at least familiar with.
We believe that addressing the topics that a credit investor focuses on as early as possible in a startups lifecycle will help create a more resilient business through and through. We are realistic in that we understand there are often a million projects all competing for resources, but weāve seen plenty of companies that thrive because they chose to prioritize operational, regulatory and infrastructure as early as possible.
Debt should not be considered a replacement for equity. In reality, when evaluating early-stage firms, venture financiers frequently utilize equity as their main form of validation. As a result, many entrepreneurs raise debt following an equity round.Ā
If a considerable amount of additional equity capital is needed to fund the company, accepting heavy debt at the seed stage is usually not the best course of action. Typically, institutional VC investors don't want to see a significant amount of their new equity going toward paying off previous debt.